Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Facewash in Treatment of Acne

 

Mohammed Arfath M I, Prashant Nayak*

NITTE (Deemed to be University), NGSM Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences,

Department of Pharmaceutics, Paneer, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: prashantn2001@nitte.edu.in

 

ABSTRACT:

Neem-based facewash formulations are widely used for their potential benefits in acne management and skin health. This study aimed to evaluate the physical properties, pH, washability, Spreadability, greasiness, and antimicrobial activity of three newly developed neem facewash formulations (F1, F2, F3) compared to a marketed product. The formulations were assessed for appearance, consistency, Odor, pH, washability, and greasiness using standard protocols. Antimicrobial efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans was evaluated using the disc diffusion method. All formulations exhibited a pleasant Odor and semi-solid consistency, with F1, F2, and F3 differing in colour from the green marketed product. The pH values of F1 (4.9), F2 (5.6), and F3 (5.3) were slightly lower than the marketed product (5.8), yet remained within the dermatologically acceptable range. All formulations demonstrated good washability and non-greasiness. The Spreadability of F2 closely resembled that of the marketed face wash, indicating better ease of application. Among the formulations, F2 exhibited the most significant antimicrobial activity, producing notable zones of inhibition against both S. aureus and C. albicans. In conclusion, the newly formulated neem facewashes showed favourable physical and functional characteristics, with F2 standing out due to its superior antimicrobial properties and optimal Spreadability. These findings suggest that F2 holds promise as an effective herbal skincare product. Further studies are recommended to optimize formulation parameters and assess the long-term stability, safety, and user acceptability of the formulation.

 

KEYWORDS: Neem, Cinnamon, Facewash, Greasiness, Antimicrobial activity.

 

 


INTRODUCTION: 

Acne is a common dermatological condition that occurs when dead skin cells clog hair follicles, leading to the formation of whiteheads, pimples, and cysts. It affects up to 80% of adolescents and predominantly appears on areas with dense pilosebaceous glands, such as the face, chest, and back. Pimples typically present as red patches with a white centre due to inflammation or bacterial infection, while cystic lesions form deeper in the skin from blocked follicles.1

 

 

The skin, the body's largest organ, serves as a vital barrier against physical, chemical, and UV-related stressors while also contributing to vitamin D synthesis. However, increased exposure to environmental pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, oxidants, particulate matter, and cigarette smoke has been associated with rising cases of skin irritation, allergies, acne, and even skin cancer.2 While conventional face washes and topical agents are widely used for acne management, concerns over the long-term side effects of synthetic chemicals have prompted interest in herbal alternatives. India’s rich biodiversity, including medicinal herbs and spices, offers a promising source for the development of safer, plant-based skincare products.3

 

Major contributing factors to acne include bacterial infections, excessive sebum production, hormonal changes, sedentary lifestyle, poor dietary habits, stress, and environmental triggers. Antibiotics, such as tetracycline, were first used successfully in the 1950s due to their anti-inflammatory properties4. In the 1960s, Retin-A (tretinoin), a vitamin A derivative, was introduced to treat acne scars and was later proven effective in reducing oil production by skin glands. During the 1990s, laser therapies emerged as successful treatments, particularly for nodular and cystic acne. Tretinoin remains a cornerstone topical treatment for acne management since its discovery in the 1970’s.5.

 

The skin, being the largest organ of the human body, is home to a varied microbiota that is essential for preserving skin health. Key microbial genera associated with healthy skin include Staphylococcus, Propionibacterium, Streptococcus, Corynebacterium, and Malassezia. Areas rich in sebaceous glands, such as the face and upper trunk, are predominantly colonized by P. acnes and P. granulosum. Interestingly, P. acnes has also been isolated from non-cutaneous sites like the oral cavity, gastrointestinal tract, and prostate, suggesting it may have broader mutualistic functions beyond its role on the skin.6

 

Face wash, also known as a facial cleanser, is an essential component of daily skincare routines. It functions by removing dead skin cells, dirt, oil, sweat, sebum, makeup, and other impurities from the skin's surface, thereby helping to unclog pores. Most face washes are formulated as foaming solutions that cleanse the skin effectively, leaving it refreshed and revitalized.7

 

Acne typically manifests in two distinct forms: whiteheads and blackheads. Whiteheads, referred to as closed comedones, form beneath the skin when pores are obstructed by sebum, dead skin cells, and bacteria, yet are still covered by a delicate layer of skin. Conversely, blackheads, known as open comedones, arise when the obstructed pores are exposed to air, leading to the oxidation and darkening of the trapped sebum, which produces their distinctive black appearance on the skin's surface.8

 

Acne is generally classified into six major types:

1.     Whiteheads (Non-inflammatory): Closed pores blocked by dead skin and oil; painless and under the skin.

2.     Blackheads (Non-inflammatory): Open pores clogged with sebum and debris; visible as dark spots.

3.     Papules (Inflammatory): Small red, tender bumps without visible pus, caused by inflamed hair follicles.

4.     Pustules (Inflammatory): Evolve from papules; contain visible pus and may be painful.

5.     Nodules (Inflammatory): Large, painful lesions deep within the skin; slow to heal.

6.     Cystic Acne: The most severe form; painful cysts beneath the skin that can cause scarring and require medical attention.9

 

The formulation incorporates a variety of botanicals known for their therapeutic properties against acne:

·       Cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum, C.cassia): Possesses strong antifungal, antioxidant, and antibacterial activity, making it effective in acne management.

·       Lemon (Citrus limon): Rich in antioxidants and exhibits potent antimicrobial action, helpful in cleansing and brightening the skin.

·       Honey (Apis mellifera): A natural humectant with antibacterial and antiseptic properties; helps soothe and hydrate the skin.

·       Neem (Azadirachta indica) and Tulsi (Ocimum sanctum): Fresh leaves are washed, dried, and used for their antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory effects.

·       Moringa (Moringa oleifera): A well-studied antioxidant source, containing bioactives like carotene, vitamin C, and phenolics that support skin health.10

 

Advanced carrier-based topical drug delivery systems have demonstrated enhanced effectiveness in treating acne. However, local side effects such as skin irritation, erythema, dryness, peeling, and scaling remain challenges. Compared to conventional treatments, vesicular and particulate carriers such as liposomes, polymeric microspheres, and solid lipid nanoparticles offer improved drug delivery with reduced side effects. Encapsulation of anti-acne drugs in these novel systems helps maintain therapeutic efficacy while minimizing skin irritation.11

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Materials:

Fresh neem leaves, cinnamon bark, orange peels, lemon, aloevera, and soap nuts were locally purchased from a grocery shop in Deralakatte.

 

Methods:

The collected herbal ingredients were first grinded using a grinder to obtain fine particles, which were then separated for use. Fresh neem leaves were dried in the shade, and 250 grams of these dried leaves were soaked in 5 liters of water overnight. After soaking, the leaves were gently pounded to extract active compounds, and the liquid was squeezed out. Approximately 20 grams of soap were dissolved in a small volume of water to act as the base vehicle for the face wash. The herbal mixture was filtered 3 to 4 times using standard filter paper to remove solid residues, and the clear filtrate was collected. This filtrate was then concentrated by heating it in a water bath at 60–70°C for 2 to 3 hours.12,13 After reaching the desired concentration, the solution was cooled before mixing with other formulation ingredients; neem and cinnamon concentrations were varied to assess their antibacterial effects. Lemon juice, orange peel, soap nut, and aloe vera were kept constant for their respective roles, as shown in Table 1. This approach enabled a clear evaluation of each ingredient’s contribution to the facewash formulation.

 

Table 1: Formulation chart of herbal Face wash

Sr. No

Ingredients

F1

F2

F3

Role

1.

Neem

3mg

4mg

5mg

Antibacterial

2.

Cinnamon

5mg

4ml

3ml

Antibacterial

3.

Lemon juice

2.5

ml

2.5 ml

2.5

ml

Help to lighten the skin

4

Orange peel

4mg

4mg

4mg

Cleansing

5.

Soap nut

2mg

2mg

2mg

Forming agent

6.

Alovera

2ml

2ml

2ml

Anti- inflammatory

7.

Purified water

q.s

q.s

q.s

Vehicle

 

EVALUATION:

The formulated herbal facewash was evaluated through a series of physicochemical, mechanical, and biological tests to assess its quality, performance, and safety.


Physical Evaluation: Visual inspection was used to assess colour, Odor, and texture. Homogeneity and consistency were examined to ensure smooth and uniform distribution without any particulate matter.14 Grittiness was evaluated microscopically (40× magnification).

 

pH Evaluation: A 1% aqueous solution of the formulation was analysed using a calibrated digital pH meter to confirm its compatibility with skin pH.

 

Spreadability: was assessed to determine the ease of application of the gel formulation. A fixed amount of gel was placed between two glass slides, and a specific weight (20g) was applied to ensure uniform spreading. The time taken for the upper slide to slip off under the influence of the applied weight was recorded.15 The experiment was performed in triplicate for both the formulated and marketed gels, and the average time was used to calculate Spreadability using the formula:

 

S = M × L / T

 

 

Washability and Greasiness: Formulations were applied to the skin, and then the ease and extent of washing with water were personally assessed. The prepared formulation was applied to the skin, and then the ease and extent of washing with water were checked manually. Greasiness was evaluated through direct skin application.

 

Foamability and extrudability: Foam formation was observed upon agitation with water. Extrudability was determined by measuring the ease of product release from the container nozzle.

 

Antimicrobial Activity: The antimicrobial efficacy was evaluated using the disc diffusion method. The formulation was tested against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Candida albicans (ATCC 10231) using Mueller-Hinton agar. Wells containing the herbal formulation and standard antibiotic (amoxicillin) were incubated at 37°C for 24–48 hours, and zones of inhibition were measured to determine antimicrobial potency.16

 

RESULT:

Physical Appearance:

The physical characteristics of the formulated facewashes (F1, F2, and F3) were evaluated and compared with a marketed Neem facewash. Visual inspection was employed to assess colour, Odor, and texture. All formulations displayed a pleasant Odor and a smooth texture. The colour of the formulations was brown, whereas the marketed product exhibited a green hue, characteristic of commercial neem-based products.

Homogeneity and consistency were confirmed through visual and tactile analysis, showing uniform distribution without any phase separation. All samples, including the marketed product, exhibited a semi-solid and stable consistency suitable for topical application. No particulate matter was observed in any of the samples.

 

Microscopic evaluation under 40× magnification revealed no grittiness in any formulation, indicating a smooth and finely blended product, ensuring comfort and safety upon application as given in Table 2.


Table No. 2: Results of formulation and marketed formulation

Formulation

Colour

Odour

Texture

Homogeneity

Consistency

Particulate matter

Grittiness

Marketed Neem facewash

Green

Pleasant

Smooth

Uniform distribution

Semi-solid and stable

None observed

No gritty particles

F1

Brown

Pleasant

Smooth

Uniform distribution

Semi-solid and stable

None observed

No gritty particles

F2

Brown

Pleasant

Smooth

Uniform distribution

Semi-solid and stable

None observed

No gritty particles

F3

Brown

Pleasant

Smooth

Uniform distribution

Semi-solid and stable

None observed

No gritty particles

 


 

 

 

 

Table No. 3: PH results of formulation and marketed formulation

Formulation code

PH

Marketed

5.8

F1

4.9

F2

5.6

F3

5.3

 

The pH of the marketed neem facewash was 5.8, aligning well with the skin’s natural pH. Among the formulations, F2(5.6) and F3(5.3) showed similar, skin-friendly values. F1 had a slightly more acidic pH of 4.9, as per Table 2, but remained within the acceptable range for topical use.

 

Washability:

Table No.4: Washability results of formulation and marketed formulation

Formulation code

Washability

Marketed

Good

F1

Good

F2

Good

F3

Good

 

The washability of the various facewash formulations was assessed and is summarized in Table 4.

 

Spreadability:

Table No.5: Spreadability results of formulation and marketed formulation

Formulation code

Spreadability (gm.cm/sec)

Marketed

5.909

F1

4.913

F2

5.416

F3

2.6

 

The Spreadability of the various facewash formulations was measured and is summarized in Table 5.

 

Greasiness:

Table No. 6: Greasiness results of formulation and marketed formulation

Formulation code

Greasiness

Marketed

No

F1

No

F2

No

F3

No

 

The greasiness of the various facewash formulations was evaluated and is summarized in Table 6.

 

Foamability and Extrudability:

Table No. 7: Foamability and Extrudability results of formulation and marketed formulation

Formulation Code

Foamability

Extrudability

Marketed Neem Facewash

Good foam formation

Easy extrusion from the tube

F1

Moderate foam formation

Easy extrusion with slight pressure

F2

Good foam formation

Smooth and easy extrusion

F3

Slight foam formation

Moderate extrusion requiring some pressure

Marketed and F2 showed good foam formation and Easy extrusion from the tube, as shown in Table 7

 

Anti-microbial activity:

Table No. 8: Anti-microbial activity against S aureus

Formulation

Zone of inhibition in mm

Amoxicillin STD

23

F 1

9

F 2

26

F 3

22

 

Table No.8 and Figure 1A show the antimicrobial activity against S aureus.

 

Table No.9: Anti-microbial activity against Candida albicans

Formulation

Zone of inhibition in mm

Clotrimazole STD

9

F 1

7

F 2

11

F 3

7

 

Table No. 9 and Figure 1B show the Anti-microbial activity against Candida albicans

 

 

Figure 1:  Anti-microbial activity against 1 A S aureus and 1 B Candida albicans

 

DISCUSSION:

The current study aimed to evaluate and compare the physicochemical properties and biological efficacy of three herbal facewash formulations (F1, F2, and F3) with a marketed Neem-based facewash. The results of the physical evaluation, pH, Spreadability, greasiness, and antimicrobial activity are summarized in Tables 2–9 and Figures 1A and 1B.

 

All formulations (F1–F3) exhibited satisfactory physical characteristics, including pleasant odor, smooth texture, uniform homogeneity, and stable semi-solid consistency without visible particulate matter or grittiness. These results are essential for consumer acceptability and effective application.17 The marketed facewash had a green color due to added coloring agents, whereas the brown hue of the formulations reflects the natural herbal ingredients used.

 

The pH of a face wash plays a crucial role in maintaining skin barrier integrity and minimizing irritation. Human skin typically maintains an acidic pH ranging from 4.5 to 6.5.18 The marketed product had a pH of 5.8, consistent with normal skin pH. Among the formulations, F2(5.6) and F3(5.3) were closest to this range, making them suitable for topical application. F1 showed a slightly more acidic pH (4.9) but remained within the acceptable dermatological limit.

 

All the formulations showed good washability and no greasiness, which are important attributes for user comfort and post-wash feel. The absence of greasy residue suggests efficient removal of dirt and sebum without disrupting the natural oil balance, which is consistent with consumer expectations.19

 

Spreadability is a critical parameter affecting the ease of application. Higher values indicate a better spread over the skin surface. F2(5.416 gm·cm/sec) demonstrated higher Spreadability compared to F1 (4.913) and F3 (2.6), indicating better user handling and coverage during facial application. The marketed formulation had the highest Spreadability (5.909), but F2 was a close second and within acceptable functional limits.

 

Foamability is a crucial parameter for face wash products, as consumers often associate foaming with cleansing efficiency.20 The marketed facewash and F2 demonstrated good foam formation upon agitation with water, indicating better surfactant action. F1 showed moderate foam, while F3 exhibited only slight foam formation, possibly due to a lower concentration or less effective surfactant system.

 

Extrudability is a measure of the ease with which a product can be dispensed from its container. All formulations were extrudable, but F2 showed the most user-friendly characteristics, with smooth flow and minimal effort required. F3 required more pressure, which may affect consumer perception and convenience.

 

The antimicrobial effectiveness was evaluated against Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans, pathogens commonly associated with skin infections and acne. F2 showed the highest zone of inhibition against S. aureus (26mm),21 even surpassing the standard drug amoxicillin (23 mm), indicating excellent antibacterial potential. Against Candida albicans, F2(11mm) also showed superior antifungal activity compared to the standard clotrimazole (9mm) (Tables 7 and 8, Figure 1).

 

These results strongly support the efficacy of F2 as a potent antimicrobial herbal formulation, likely due to its optimized composition of bioactive plant extracts.

     

CONCLUSION:

The newly developed neem facewash formulations (F1, F2, and F3) demonstrated strong potential as effective, natural skincare alternatives to the marketed product. All formulations were semi-solid, homogeneous, easily washable, and pleasantly scented, aligning with consumer expectations. Although they differed in colour (brown v/s green), this was due to ingredient variation and did not affect performance. The pH values (4.9–5.6) were within the ideal range for maintaining skin health, indicating their suitability for regular use. F1 and F2 exhibited Spreadability similar to the marketed facewash, while F3 showed slightly lower values. All formulations were non-greasy and provided excellent washability, ensuring a clean, residue-free feel. Notably, antimicrobial studies revealed significant activity of F2 and F3 against Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans. F2 outperformed the standard antibiotics (amoxicillin and clotrimazole), suggesting added therapeutic benefits. Among the three, F2 emerged as the most balanced in terms of Spreadability, skin compatibility, and antimicrobial efficacy. These findings support the potential of neem-based facewash, particularly F2, for further development as an herbal skincare product. Continued research, including stability assessments and clinical evaluations, is recommended to confirm long-term effectiveness and user acceptance, paving the way for successful commercialization.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors declare no conflict of interest with the data contained in the manuscript.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:

Concept: MAMI, PN; Design: MAMI, PN; Data Collection or Processing: MAMI, PN; Analysis or Interpretation: PN; Literature Search: MAMI, PN; Writing: MAMI; Approval: PN. We gratefully acknowledge the infrastructural and technical support provided by NGSM Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, for facilitating the successful completion of this work.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Vasam M, Korutla S, Bohara RA. Acne vulgaris: a review of the pathophysiology, treatment, and recent nanotechnology-based advances. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2023; 36: 101578. doi:10.1016/j.bbrep.2023.101578

2.      Jin H, Lin Z, et al. Effects and mechanisms of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in inflammatory skin diseases. Sci Total Environ. 2024; 925: 171492. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171492

3.      Pal RS, Pal Y, et al A. Current review on herbs for derma care. Open Dermatol J. 2019; 13(1). doi:10.2174/1874372201913010041

4.      Orylska Ratynska M, Placek W, Owczarczyk Saczonek A. Tetracyclines—an important therapeutic tool for dermatologists. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(12): 7246. doi:10.3390/ijerph19127246

5.      Sumita JM, Leonardi GR, Bagatin E. Tretinoin peel: a critical view. An Bras Dermatol. 2017; 92(3): 363–366. doi:10.1590/abd1806 4841.201755325

6.      Barnard E, Li H. Shaping of cutaneous function by encounters with commensals. J Physiol. 2017; 595(2): 437–450. doi:10.1113/JP271638

7.      Fabbrocini G, Annunziata MC, et al. Acne scars: pathogenesis, classification and treatment. Dermatol Res Pract. 2010;2010:893080. doi:10.1155/2010/893080

8.      Nand P, Drabu S, Gupta RK, Bhatnagar A, Ali R. In vitro and in vivo assessment of polyherbal topical gel formulation for the treatment of acne vulgaris. Int J Drug Deliv. 2012; 4(4): 434–443. doi:10.5138/ijdd.2012.0975.0215.04025

9.      Kamble M, Selwate T, Dhabarde D, Ingole A, Baheti J. Formulation and evaluation of anti-acne face wash gel using guava seed extract. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2019; 9(3): 5–7. doi:10.22270/jddt.v9i3.2595

10.   Lokanatha O, Mamatha S, Reddy D. Antimicrobial activity of Azadirachta indica (Neem) leaf, bark, and seed extracts. Int J Res Phytochem Pharmacol. 2013; 3(1): 1–4.

11.   Castro GA, Ferreira LA. Novel vesicular and particulate drug delivery systems for topical treatment of acne. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2008; 5(6): 665–679. doi:10.1517/17425247.5.6.665

12.   Bhaskar G, Arshia S, Priyadarshini SRB. Formulation and evaluation of topical polyherbal antiacne gels containing Garcinia mangostana and Aloe vera. Pharmacogn Mag. 2009; 5(19 Suppl):93–99. http://www.phcog.com/text.asp?2009/5/19/93/59791

13.   Ujah II, Nsude CA, et al. Phytochemicals of the neem plant (Azadirachta indica) explain its use in traditional medicine and pest control. GSC Biol Pharm Sci. 2021; 14(2): 165–171.   doi:10.30574/gscbps.2021.14.2.0394

14.   Chandrasekar R, Sivagami B. Formulation and evaluation of a poly herbal skin care cream containing neem and Tulsi. Res J Top Cosmet Sci. 2018; 9(1): 25–32.doi:10.5958/2321-5844.2018.00006.7

15.   Jadhav PJ, Mane AN, Gilda SS, Kumbhar VB, Jadhav MB, Ghadge AA. Formulation and evaluation of poly herbal anti-acne face wash gel. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2016; 5(7): 1184–1190. doi:10.20959/wjpr20167 6531

16.   Sinha P, Srivastava S, Mishra N, Yadav NP. New perspectives on antiacne plant drugs: contribution to modern therapeutics. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 301304. doi:10.1155/2014/301304

17.   Dureja H, Kaushik D, Gupta M, Kumar V, Lather V. Cosmeceuticals: an emerging concept. Indian J Pharmacol. 2005; 37(3): 155–159. doi:10.4103/0253-7613.16211

18.   Lambers H, Piessens S, Bloem A, Pronk H, Finkel P. Natural skin surface pH is on average below 5, which is beneficial for its resident flora. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2006; 28(5): 359–370. doi:10.1111/j.1467-2494.2006.00344.x

19.   Luebberding S, Krueger N, Kerscher M. Skin physiology in men and women: clinical implications. Clin Dermatol. 2013; 31(1): 3–9. doi:10.1159/000351349

20.   Mukhopadhyay P. Cleansers and their role in various dermatological disorders. Indian J Dermatol. 2011; 56(1): 2–6. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.77542

21.   Mutimer MN, Riffkin C, Hill JA, Lang CA, Huber J. Modern ointment bases—technology and function. J Am Pharm Assoc. 1956; 45(4): 212–218. doi:10.1002/jps.3030450406

 

 

 

Received on 02.06.2025      Revised on 22.10.2025

Accepted on 24.12.2025      Published on 05.06.2026

Available online from June 06, 2026

Research J. Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(6):2853-2858.

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00407

© RJPT All right reserved

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License.